[rules-users] "in" syntax breaking the Rete Tree

[droolster]

When I use the "in" operator, it breaks the Rete diagram e.g, if I do

Class X {

private into foo;

//setter & getter for foo
}

rule "ABC" 
when
    X ( foo in (2,3) )
then
System.out.println ("Hello");
end

it breaks the Rete Tree with a java.lang.NullPointerException:null.

Why does it do that? That is valid syntax.

Regards,




--
View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/in-syntax-breaking-the-Rete-Tree-tp4028148.html
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.