[rules-users] Attribute comparison thru decision table

bala.ganesh at accenture.com bala.ganesh at accenture.com
Tue Feb 18 07:03:45 EST 2014


Thanks Wolfgang. This really clarifies my doubt

-Bala

-----Original Message-----
From: rules-users-bounces at lists.jboss.org [mailto:rules-users-bounces at lists.jboss.org] On Behalf Of Wolfgang Laun
Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2014 5:13 PM
To: Rules Users List
Subject: Re: [rules-users] Attribute comparison thru decision table

If you look at the decision table examples in the Drools documentation you'll see that decision tables don't fit the pattern you have posted.

But you can rules to do what you want, and you'll need one rule for each comparison if a distinct action is to be performed for each inequality.

-W

On 18/02/2014, bala.ganesh at accenture.com <bala.ganesh at accenture.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a requirement to compare attributes in two objects(Object1 Vs.
> Object2) and store the values based on business rule in object 3.
> Example rules:
>
>                 If (Obj1.atrr1 != Obj2.atrr1)
>                  Then Obj3.attr1 = Obj2.atrr1
>
>                 If (Obj1.atrr2 != Obj2.atrr2)
>                  Then Obj3.attr2 = Obj1.atrr2
>
>                 If (Obj1.atrr3 - Obj2.atrr3 > 10)
>                  Then Obj3.attr3 = Obj1.atrr3
>
> We are planning to use decision table for this to avoid a separate GUI
> development.
> Would like to know whether writing rule for each attribute is the only
> solution or is there any simpler approach?
>
>
> Thanks in advance,
> -Bala
>
> ________________________________
>
> This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain
> privileged, proprietary, or otherwise confidential information. If you
> have received it in error, please notify the sender immediately and
> delete the original. Any other use of the e-mail by you is prohibited.
> Where allowed by local law, electronic communications with Accenture
> and its affiliates, including e-mail and instant messaging (including
> content), may be scanned by our systems for the purposes of
> information security and assessment of internal compliance with Accenture policy. .
> ______________________________________________________________________
> ________________
>
> www.accenture.com
>
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users at lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users


________________________________

This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain privileged, proprietary, or otherwise confidential information. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the original. Any other use of the e-mail by you is prohibited. Where allowed by local law, electronic communications with Accenture and its affiliates, including e-mail and instant messaging (including content), may be scanned by our systems for the purposes of information security and assessment of internal compliance with Accenture policy. .
______________________________________________________________________________________

www.accenture.com




More information about the rules-users mailing list