[rules-users] "in" syntax breaking the Rete Tree

[droolster]

I can't give you my exact code as it is company-sensitive code. But you can
test this against any POJO with a few int and Integer fields.

I'm trying to promote Drools Expert in my organisation so I would appreciate
your help. It's not causing a problem with rule evaluation. That is working
fine. But it doesn't look good when things which should be working are not.



--
View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/in-operator-breaking-the-Rete-Tree-tp4028148p4028169.html
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.