[rules-users] "in" syntax breaking the Rete Tree

[Mark Proctor]

On 20 Feb 2014, at 14:42, Davide Sottara <dsotty at gmail.com> wrote:

> Please open a JIRA ticket, this is the way bugs are reported to the
> development team.
> 
> https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS
+1

We saw the message. It’s a bug, so no work arounds, so not much to discuss. Open a JIRA, and it’ll get fixed eventually. The Rete viewer though is low priority right now, so it’s not likely to be fixed soon. If we get a fix, via a pull request, we’ll of course escalate and get it applied.
http://docs.jboss.org/drools/release/5.6.0.Final/droolsjbpm-introduction-docs/html/gettingstarted.html

Mark
> 
> Davide
> 
> On 02/20/2014 03:38 PM, droolster wrote:
>> @laune, any update? Should I post to Stackoverflow as you are active there.
>> Is this forum dead?
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/in-operator-breaking-the-Rete-Tree-tp4028148p4028204.html
>> Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>> _______________________________________________
>> rules-users mailing list
>> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users