[rules-users] "in" syntax breaking the Rete Tree

[Mark Proctor]

> 
> "We saw this message..." - then why wasn't the advice given to raise a bug
> earlier? Why did it take 8 posts to eventually get to that point? It's a
> waste of time and effort, and a lack of appreciation for people who are
> trying to promote your product in their industry and workplace.


When you tell people they are wasting your time, and you accuse them of not appreciating you, that is abusive behaviour. It adds nothing to the technical discussions in this list, and is simply venting of your frustrations. This is not acceptable, and it is my job to make sure it does not happen.

Mark

On 24 Feb 2014, at 15:56, droolster <quant.coder at gmail.com> wrote:

> @Mark, like I said in my previous post, "when you get off your high-horse"...
> you may see things differently.
> 
> 
> 
> --
> View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/in-operator-breaking-the-Rete-Tree-tp4028148p4028271.html
> Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users