<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
<title></title>
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
There is no reason why it can't be done with OCL, and I often hear of
people writting OCL drivers. I imagine most developers choose a
proprietary language because they feel it empowers the paradigm
further, for instance our I believe our language has less repitition
and more expressability that OCL, which is made possible due to our
specific use case.<br>
<br>
Mark<br>
<br>
but more simply its not as natural a fir for a ru<br>
Elena Ţibrea wrote:
<blockquote
cite="mid:a72330f0701170105nc423c9agb7e10bc3778639dd@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div>Hi,</div>
<div><br clear="all">
I've been recently reading an article about OCL where the authour
states he sees no major dificulties for adopting OCL as notation for
specifying the <i>activation condition</i> that triggers the <i>action
part</i> of a reactive rule.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>I wonder than why rule engines use proprietary rule
languages and not smth standardized like OCL?<br>
</div>
<pre wrap="">
<hr size="4" width="90%">
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org">rules-users@lists.jboss.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users">https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>