[seam-dev] Please remember to actually try validate xml with xsd's ; )

[Pete Muir]

Max,

This is what we call a "bug" - they do happen in products outside JBDS  
where we don't have such excellent engineers as you :p

Actually, I think this was already reported in JIRA?

On 22 Nov 2008, at 03:13, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:

> On Fri, 21 Nov 2008 17:07:08 +0100, Jay Balunas <tech4j at gmail.com>  
> wrote:
>
>> I wondering why this was not caught in our release testing - I  
>> would assume that it is because none of the examples and/or current  
>> JBDS tests strike this issue.  We will look further into this and  
>> try to come up with a good way to verify.
>
> Enable schema validation in a test run and it should reveal it - this
> isn't really a JBDS specific issue, it would fail in any validating
> xml editor.
>
> Note: Seam's xml is extremely nice and strict compared to other  
> projects like
> e.g. ESB where the DTD/XSD is basically useless since anything can  
> be nested
> in anything according to the XSD but the runtime doesn't support  
> that and
> in other places it is stated that the attribute is a number/string  
> etc. but
> actually they have support for ${} property style replacement too  
> causing us
> to disable validation and do custom hacks around the xsd to have the  
> editing
> not fail on valid files...a paain!
>
> So big kudos to seam XSD files - but remember to use them for  
> validation once
> in a while and we should avoid degenerating into what ESB XSD's are ;)
>
> /max
>
>>
>> -Jay
>>
>>
>> On Nov 21, 2008, at 10:56 AM, Norman Richards wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Nov 21, 2008, at 9:47 AM, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
>>>
>>>> Right now redirect view-id can't use EL expression's according to  
>>>> the XSD
>>>>
>>>> Causing xml validators to complain (https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBIDE-3248 
>>>> )
>>>> because of the XSD having a weird limitation as reported in https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBSEAM-3741
>>>>
>>>> I assume that .xsd change was not what you actually wanted ?
>>>
>>> I'll fix this for 2.1.1.CR2.  It looks like the components.xml  
>>> stricter typing made it to pages.xml, but without the addition of  
>>> allowing EL  
>>> expressions._______________________________________________
>>> seam-dev mailing list
>>> seam-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
>>
>
>
>
> -- 
> /max
> _______________________________________________
> seam-dev mailing list
> seam-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev