[seam-dev] Seam 2.1 issues in Tools

[Shane Bryzak]

If you point me toward the method/class that does this, I'll rewrite it 
to work with the security components that are in the 1% (I'll probably 
have to hard code some component names).


Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Oct 2008 00:27:22 +0200, Shane Bryzak 
> <shane.bryzak at jboss.com> wrote:
>
>> Ok as Pete said it may have something to do with the new 
>> multi-package support for namespaces.  How are you doing the 
>> translation?
>
> As described below. We simply do 
> org.jboss.seam.[postcolonname].[camelcaseoftagname]
>
> Was told by Gavin et.al. that would be sufficient 99% of the time ;)
>
> I guess we just hit the 1%
>
> /max
>
>>
>> Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
>>> On Wed, 22 Oct 2008 00:23:45 +0200, Shane Bryzak 
>>> <shane.bryzak at jboss.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> This attribute was simply moved (from identity to 
>>>> rule-based-permission-resolver) in Seam 2.1.0, no library 
>>>> requirements were changed for security.  Is there a security rules 
>>>> file present, and is there a specific exception produced?  This 
>>>> change was documented in seam21migration.txt in the root of the 
>>>> Seam dist, might be worth checking there for any other potentially 
>>>> breaking changes.
>>>
>>> The problem is the missing class...we translate 
>>> security:rule-based-permission-resolver to 
>>> org.jboss.seam.security.RuleBasedPermissionResolver;
>>> that is apparently not enough anymore for the core tags.
>>>
>>> /max
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> Walking through jira issues for JBT 3 beta1 and I just stumbled into
>>>>> https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBIDE-2702 which is caused by
>>>>> <security:rule-based-permission-resolver 
>>>>> security-rules="#{securityRules}"/>
>>>>> now being in components.xml by default.
>>>>>
>>>>> That is for some reason failing for us - probably we are missing a 
>>>>> drools jar or something ;)
>>>>>
>>>>> Before I start finding these changes in 2.1 that might break 
>>>>> current tools behavior the hard way,
>>>>> do you guys got a list of major 2.1 changes that changes lib 
>>>>> dependencies/startup sequence etc. ?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
>