[seam-dev] Porting package for Seam

[Pete Muir]

And what sort of classes aren't bean classes?

On 22 Apr 2009, at 08:51, Pete Muir wrote:

> Why do you need to do this? I can't see any reason for it.
>
> On 22 Apr 2009, at 02:18, Shane Bryzak wrote:
>
>> It seems that we need something like the webbeans porting package  
>> but for Seam, since we need to be able to get a reference to the  
>> current manager statically from non-bean classes.  Any thoughts on  
>> this Pete?
>> _______________________________________________
>> seam-dev mailing list
>> seam-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
>
> --
> Pete Muir
> http://www.seamframework.org
> http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Pete
>

--
Pete Muir
http://www.seamframework.org
http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Pete