[seam-dev] First cab off the rank!

[Stuart Douglas]

That makes sense. I don't know what I was thinking as you couldn't have a JDK proxy extend AnnotationLiteral anyway.  I will look at redoing mine using JDK proxies to remove the javassist dependency. 

Stuart

________________________________________
From: Gavin King [gavin.king at gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, 30 November 2009 11:58 AM
To: Stuart Douglas
Cc: seam-dev at lists.jboss.org
Subject: Re: [seam-dev] First cab off the rank!

By "all the interfaces", I mean both interfaces.

On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 7:58 PM, Gavin King <gavin.king at gmail.com> wrote:
> Right but Annotation and every annotation type are all interfaces. You
> would not be able to extend AnnotationLiteral, but you don't really
> need that. All you need is to be able to implement all the interfaces.
>
> On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 7:54 PM, Stuart Douglas
> <stuart at baileyroberts.com.au> wrote:
>> I don't think that this would be possible as the jdk proxy only allows you to implement SomeInterface, not SomeInterface<Foo> (i.e. there is no mechanism for generating a signature attribute in the proxy). When weld tries to get this information a GenericSignatureFormatError would result (I saw this in my code before I added the SignitureAttribute ). I may be wrong on this, but I can't see any way around it.
>>
>> Stuart
>> ________________________________________
>> From: seam-dev-bounces at lists.jboss.org [seam-dev-bounces at lists.jboss.org] On Behalf Of Gavin King [gavin.king at gmail.com]
>> Sent: Monday, 30 November 2009 5:32 AM
>> To: Shane Bryzak
>> Cc: seam-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> Subject: Re: [seam-dev] First cab off the rank!
>>
>> You used a jdk dynamicproxy? Probably a better idea.
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>> On Nov 29, 2009, at 1:01 PM, Shane Bryzak <sbryzak at redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Done, although I didn't need to use Javassist. ;)
>>>
>>> On 30/11/09 02:38, Gavin King wrote:
>>>> Stuart has some code to do this using javassist.
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 2:00 AM, Shane Bryzak<sbryzak at redhat.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Almost got this working, however I need to be able to reflectively
>>>>> create an
>>>>> AnnotationLiteral, given a String containing the fully qualified
>>>>> name of the
>>>>> qualifier.  Anyone done this before?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> seam-dev mailing list
>> seam-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Gavin King
> gavin.king at gmail.com
> http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Gavin
> http://hibernate.org
> http://seamframework.org
>



--
Gavin King
gavin.king at gmail.com
http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Gavin
http://hibernate.org
http://seamframework.org