[seam-dev] Interceptor packaging convention

[Pete Muir]

On 11 Apr 2010, at 05:11, Gavin King wrote:

> On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 7:23 AM, Pete Muir <pmuir at redhat.com> wrote:
> 
>> BTW A slightly better approach (which avoids at least the nastiness of this approach, but
>> doesn't avoid the issue of ordering - which IMO is insurmountable)  is to write a
>> SeamInterceptor which can cope with using relative ordering semantics and require users
>> to just enable that.
> 
> Sure, but the problem is that then you can't interleave other
> interceptors with the Seam interceptors.

Perhaps I should have prefaced it "a slightly better-than-terrible way" ;-)