[seam-dev] Move weld-wicket to seam-wicket?

[Clint Popetz]

It's fine with me; I've never understood the line between weld and
seam3 anyway :)

-Clint

On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 9:39 AM, Pete Muir <pmuir at redhat.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Since we've started developing Seam 3, I've started to think that the Wicket support is a better fit for Seam rather than Weld. Most of the Weld sub projects handle integrating Weld into other environments (such as Java SE) or provide support for using Weld (e.g. Weld extensions, archetypes).
>
> There wasn't a consensus in our meeting yesterday, so I wanted to open it up for discussion.
>
> Pete
> _______________________________________________
> seam-dev mailing list
> seam-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
>



-- 
Clint Popetz
http://42lines.net
Scalable Web Application Development