[seam-dev] Interceptor packaging convention

[Lincoln Baxter, III]

> > So I guess the real issue at hand is...the consistent packaging of
> interceptors is really about making the <interceptors> element as simple as
> possible by making all the interceptors classes have the same number of
> package segments. That need may or may not be contrived. I haven't stood in
> the shoes of the developer yet being required to list out a bunch of
> interceptor classes.
>
> It sounds contrived to me. Where does it come from? Given that a user might
> declare some interceptors, where does that leave them?


They can call interceptors whatever they want ;)


-- 
Lincoln Baxter, III
http://ocpsoft.com
http://scrumshark.com
"Keep it Simple"
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/seam-dev/attachments/20100419/2be92d7d/attachment-0001.html