[seam-dev] Impact of the change of scope (EVENT to SESSION) of the EjbSynchronizations SFSB component?

[Steve Roy]

Should a transactions really be started at that early of an entry point in
application code?  The application code may need to do many things before a
database(or other resource) transaction is actually required.

- steve

On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 1:44 PM, Pete Muir <pmuir at redhat.com> wrote:

> I'm slightly (sorry, that's irony ;-) concerned about this, it just seems
> wrong. System transactions are request scoped in Seam.
>
> Why do we need to do this?
>
> On 3 Jun 2010, at 17:08, Denis Forveille wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Recently, to address JIRA-4542
> > (https://jira.jboss.org/browse/JBSEAM-4542) , the scope of the
> > EjbSynchronizations component has been changed from EVENT to SESSION.
> >
> > I'm worrying about the impact of such a change on the behavior on Seam
> > applications
> >
> > Is this change safe?  Is there really no impact on the applications?
> >
> > Please have a look at JIRA-4542 for more details
> >
> > Thx.
> > _______________________________________________
> > seam-dev mailing list
> > seam-dev at lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> seam-dev mailing list
> seam-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/seam-dev/attachments/20100603/063f7d44/attachment.html