[seam-dev] Interceptor packaging convention

Dan Allen dan.j.allen at gmail.com
Sat Mar 27 14:08:22 EDT 2010


On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 3:28 AM, Nicklas Karlsson <nickarls at gmail.com>wrote:

> I think AfterBeanDiscovery is enough (which is already in the spec) for the
> autoenablement extension, right?
>
> We could cast the BeanManager parameter to BeanManagerImpl and enable (and
> perhaps sort) all org.seam.* interceptors etc that the BM is aware of. Since
> there is a limited number of CDI implementations, we could also cast to
> other implementations after checking (non-imported, reflection) which one we
> are dealing with.
>
> We could also throw in a
>
> @AutoEnable(before="org.jboss.seam.foo.Interceptor")
>

> annotation if want to control the order manually or if we want to offer
> others to use this feature (in a seam context)
>
> True, we could go down that road.

-Dan

-- 
Dan Allen
Senior Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action
Registered Linux User #231597

http://mojavelinux.com
http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction
http://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/seam-dev/attachments/20100327/54bea4c1/attachment-0001.html 


More information about the seam-dev mailing list