[seam-dev] please update your POM version
Shane Bryzak
sbryzak at redhat.com
Tue Mar 30 01:05:11 EDT 2010
We have some guidelines here, could you please update them Dan:
http://www.seamframework.org/Seam3/ModuleReleaseProcedure
On 30/03/10 14:10, Dan Allen wrote:
> Module leads,
>
> When doing releases, we need to align our version numbering scheme.
> Currently, we are using one scheme in Maven artifacts (3.0.0-Alpha1)
> and one scheme for downloads (e.g., 3.0.0.Alpha1). Personally, I
> wouldn't care which one we use, as long as we use a single scheme.
> However, it turns out the JBoss has recently established a guideline
> for version numbers and I think we should follow suit.
>
> http://community.jboss.org/wiki/JBossProjectVersioning
>
> major.minor.micro.Alpha[n]
> major.minor.micro.Beta[n]
> major.minor.micro.CR <http://major.minor.micro.CR>[n]
> major.minor.micro.Final
>
> So, if there are no objections, when doing a Seam 3 module release,
> please use the format 3.x.y.Qualifier[n]. There are some
> other conventions suggested on that page that you may find useful.
>
> Thanks!
>
> -Dan
>
> --
> Dan Allen
> Senior Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action
> Registered Linux User #231597
>
> http://mojavelinux.com
> http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction
> http://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> seam-dev mailing list
> seam-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/seam-dev/attachments/20100330/f44c98bd/attachment-0001.html
More information about the seam-dev
mailing list