[seam-dev] Seam2 question - Asychnronous

[Michael Schütz]

Dan,

thanks a lot for your reply..

Yeah, it cause weird behaviour when not handled in the expected chain.


Michael


2011/3/31 Dan Allen <dan.j.allen at gmail.com>

> On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 11:19, Michael Schütz <michaelschuetz83 at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Hi to all,
>>
>> why is asynchronous interceptor "client-typed" ?
>>
>
> I believe the idea here is to defer the call to the EJB (as the type is
> only relevant when the interceptor is applied to an EJB). In fact, the
> client/server distinction is whether the interceptor is applied before
> delegating to the EJB proxy or whether the interceptor participates in the
> interceptor chain that's handled by the EJB container. So it's really a
> subtle concern.
>
> -Dan
>
> --
> Dan Allen
> Principal Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action
> Registered Linux User #231597
>
> http://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen#about
> http://mojavelinux.com
> http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/seam-dev/attachments/20110402/345691a4/attachment.html