[seam-dev] Meeting 2011-08-17

[Dan Allen]

On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 22:27, Shane Bryzak <sbryzak at redhat.com> wrote:

>  Another thing to add to the agenda which we need to discuss is dependency
> scopes.  In particular, we need to review our previous decision to make the
> implementation component of a module runtime-scoped, in light of the fact
> that we now no longer have combined jars.
>

Isn't the idea of having an API and implementation split is that you should
not be compiling against anything in the implementation? Of course, an end
user can choose to override that convention to make the implementation a
compile-time scope, but we don't want to encourage that, do we?

-Dan

-- 
Dan Allen
Principal Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action
Registered Linux User #231597

http://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen#about
http://mojavelinux.com
http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/seam-dev/attachments/20110816/af50e9f2/attachment.html