[seam-dev] Meeting 2011-08-17

[Dan Allen]

On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 23:05, Dan Allen <dan.j.allen at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 22:57, Shane Bryzak <sbryzak at redhat.com> wrote:
>
>>  Of course, but we break that rule.  Solder is one example, there's
>> multiple utility classes in the implementation that are required to compile
>> other modules.
>>
>
> I consider that a bug (or a work in progress, depending on how you look at
> it).
>

An API is an API. If it's an "internal API", then perhaps it should be an
SPI. Under no circumstances should we be depending on implementation classes
between modules. Otherwise, we are changing the definition of an
implementation.

-Dan

-- 
Dan Allen
Principal Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action
Registered Linux User #231597

http://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen#about
http://mojavelinux.com
http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/seam-dev/attachments/20110816/ab0055a4/attachment.html