[seam-dev] API Support - JMS Observer Methods

Pete Muir pmuir at redhat.com
Fri Feb 18 06:19:20 EST 2011


On 18 Feb 2011, at 00:28, John Ament wrote:

> For an overview of the original proposal, please review 
> https://issues.jboss.org/browse/SEAMJMS-3
> https://issues.jboss.org/browse/SEAMJMS-4
> 
> Why are we doing this?
> 
> The issue raised recently on the list is that during AfterBeanDiscovery, there is no guarantee that beans are available.  This conflicts with the Egress side of the feature where the full observer method must be created during ABD.  As a result, we cannot guarantee that looking up beans will work (in fact, we can typically guarantee it won't work).  Therefor, we can not support generic qualifiers on the destinations that are involved in the mapping, the extension needs to be able to resolve the destination manually.

John can you explain in more detail why you need to look up beans here? 

This restriction has generally not been a problem for implementing such extensions, so I'm curious why it is here.


More information about the seam-dev mailing list