[seam-dev] Seam JCR

[George Gastaldi]

I prefer the latter also.
seam content is also a strong name than seam jcr

Em 26/02/2011, às 19:46, "John D. Ament" <john.d.ament at gmail.com> escreveu:

George,

Yes, I have basic structure that can be put into both api and impl.  No test
cases right now though.  We can argue over annotation names if you'd like
:-)

Shane,

What top level package do you suggest? org.jboss.seam.jcr ?
org.jboss.seam.content ? I'd prefer the latter, especially if we do
eventually look at implementation specific features.

John

On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 5:17 PM, George Gastaldi <gegastaldi at gmail.com>wrote:

> Excelent! I am thrilled to start working on it. Shane, if you could please
> create the project that would help.
> John, do you have anything implemented to push into this repository ?
>
>
>
> Em 26/02/2011, às 18:12, Shane Bryzak <sbryzak at redhat.com> escreveu:
>
>  It's great to see this collaboration take place, and it's quite obvious to
> me that the idea of a Seam JCR module would be appealing to many
> developers.  George and John, would you both be willing to work on this
> module together?  For the time being I propose that we create a Seam JCR
> project at github (and treat it as a sandbox for now) which you can both
> commit to.  I can put the basic project skeleton in place so that it
> conforms in structure to the other Seam modules.  What do you think?
>
> On 27/02/11 04:08, George Gastaldi wrote:
>
> Excelent idea. I was thinking also to connect the JCR event model to CDI.
> An integration with Seam Security should also be planned.
> I am also available to work on it.
>
> 2011/2/26 John D. Ament < <john.d.ament at gmail.com>john.d.ament at gmail.com>
>
>> George,
>>
>> Funny you bring up this topic this week.  I was planning to propose a Seam
>> Content module this week, mostly because my schedule is finally clear enough
>> to allow me to work on it.  At this point, I have basic capabilities to
>> inject the necessary JCR objects into CDI beans and that all works.  I will
>> admit though, I am a little biased towards ModeShape as that is the other
>> JBoss project I work on.  Cross platform support would work correctly using
>> the service loader + repository factory approach.  In addition to basic
>> injection support, I was also looking to provide the equivalent of a
>> SeamManagedPersistenceContext for JCR.
>>
>> There are also some ModeShape specific features I was bouncing around,
>> including CDI enabled connectors, sequencers; as well as connecting their
>> event model w/ CDI's event model.
>>
>> What do you think about those ideas?
>>
>> John
>>
>>  On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 10:06 AM, George Gastaldi <<gegastaldi at gmail.com>
>> gegastaldi at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>  I was thinking to create a Seam JCR module to allow JCR (Java Content
>>> Repositories) to be injected in code. It should work for jackrabbit as
>>> well as modeshape or any other jcr 2.0 compliant implementation. Any
>>> suggestions ? Comments appreciated.
>>>  _______________________________________________
>>> seam-dev mailing list
>>>  <seam-dev at lists.jboss.org>seam-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>  <https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev>
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
>>>
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> seam-dev mailing list <seam-dev at lists.jboss.org>seam-dev at lists.jboss.org <https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev>https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/seam-dev/attachments/20110226/61edfdac/attachment.html