[seam-dev] Seam JCR

[Antoine Sabot-Durand]

Totally agree with Emmanuel. Having some kind of CMS "stub" would be a great
asset for Seam. It's something that often lack in small project. In my shop
the only answer to this issue is to build all these project that need a
light CMS around a portal (mostly Liferay :-( ). It's overkill.

Perhaps it's beyond Seam mission, but I think that high level tools like a
CMS, a wiki (what happened (or didn't happened) to wiki example in Seam 2
was very frustrating for me) or something original like Tohu can make the
difference in a framework choice.

But off course it's something bigger than just providing a toolbox and could
change  the definition of Seam.


Antoine Sabot-Durand


2011/2/28 Emmanuel Bernard <emmanuel at hibernate.org>

> Especially if one day you guys do something around CMS
>
>
> On 27 févr. 2011, at 05:00, Shane Bryzak <sbryzak at redhat.com> wrote:
>
> I think that the word 'content' is very overloaded.  People will see 'Seam
> JCR' and most will immediately recognize what it is, however 'Seam Content'
> is more ambiguous.  My +1 is for Seam JCR, but I'm open to what other people
> think.
>
> On 27/02/11 09:44, George Gastaldi wrote:
>
> I prefer the latter also.
> seam content is also a strong name than seam jcr
>
> Em 26/02/2011, às 19:46, "John D. Ament" <john.d.ament at gmail.com>
> escreveu:
>
>  George,
>
> Yes, I have basic structure that can be put into both api and impl.  No
> test cases right now though.  We can argue over annotation names if you'd
> like :-)
>
> Shane,
>
> What top level package do you suggest? org.jboss.seam.jcr ?
> org.jboss.seam.content ? I'd prefer the latter, especially if we do
> eventually look at implementation specific features.
>
> John
>
> On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 5:17 PM, George Gastaldi <gegastaldi at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>>  Excelent! I am thrilled to start working on it. Shane, if you could
>> please create the project that would help.
>> John, do you have anything implemented to push into this repository ?
>>
>>
>>
>> Em 26/02/2011, às 18:12, Shane Bryzak <sbryzak at redhat.com> escreveu:
>>
>>     It's great to see this collaboration take place, and it's quite
>> obvious to me that the idea of a Seam JCR module would be appealing to many
>> developers.  George and John, would you both be willing to work on this
>> module together?  For the time being I propose that we create a Seam JCR
>> project at github (and treat it as a sandbox for now) which you can both
>> commit to.  I can put the basic project skeleton in place so that it
>> conforms in structure to the other Seam modules.  What do you think?
>>
>> On 27/02/11 04:08, George Gastaldi wrote:
>>
>> Excelent idea. I was thinking also to connect the JCR event model to CDI.
>> An integration with Seam Security should also be planned.
>> I am also available to work on it.
>>
>> 2011/2/26 John D. Ament <john.d.ament at gmail.com>
>>
>>> George,
>>>
>>> Funny you bring up this topic this week.  I was planning to propose a
>>> Seam Content module this week, mostly because my schedule is finally clear
>>> enough to allow me to work on it.  At this point, I have basic capabilities
>>> to inject the necessary JCR objects into CDI beans and that all works.  I
>>> will admit though, I am a little biased towards ModeShape as that is the
>>> other JBoss project I work on.  Cross platform support would work correctly
>>> using the service loader + repository factory approach.  In addition to
>>> basic injection support, I was also looking to provide the equivalent of a
>>> SeamManagedPersistenceContext for JCR.
>>>
>>> There are also some ModeShape specific features I was bouncing around,
>>> including CDI enabled connectors, sequencers; as well as connecting their
>>> event model w/ CDI's event model.
>>>
>>> What do you think about those ideas?
>>>
>>> John
>>>
>>>  On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 10:06 AM, George Gastaldi <gegastaldi at gmail.com
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>>>  I was thinking to create a Seam JCR module to allow JCR (Java Content
>>>> Repositories) to be injected in code. It should work for jackrabbit as
>>>> well as modeshape or any other jcr 2.0 compliant implementation. Any
>>>> suggestions ? Comments appreciated.
>>>>  _______________________________________________
>>>> seam-dev mailing list
>>>> seam-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>  _______________________________________________
>> seam-dev mailing listseam-dev at lists.jboss.orghttps://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
>>
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> seam-dev mailing list
> seam-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> seam-dev mailing list
> seam-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/seam-dev/attachments/20110228/7d0c55a3/attachment-0001.html