[seam-dev] Issues with testing and emma

[John D. Ament]

JOse,

Thanks for the tips.  I look forward to your blog post.  I was finally able
to get 100% class showing, but still missing methods.  I look forward to
your blog post about jaoco.

John

On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 1:30 PM, José Rodolfo Freitas <
joserodolfo.freitas at gmail.com> wrote:

> sure thing
>
> https://github.com/joserodolfofreitas/jacoco-integration-testcase
>
> I'm writting a blog post on reporting arquillian test coverage with
> sonar too, I'´ll probably publish it wednesday.
>
> On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 2:19 PM, Jason Porter <lightguard.jp at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > José, would you point us to an example or send one over so the rest of
> the community can apply it, or apply it to the parent pom?
> >
> > Sent from my iPhone
> >
> > On Jul 4, 2011, at 8:17, José Rodolfo Freitas <
> joserodolfo.freitas at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> ops, sorry,
> >> I hate typing with gloves.
> >>
> >>
> >> continuing...
> >>
> >> I believe that the best approach in our case (using arquillian) would
> >> be jacoco which uses on the fly bytecode instrumentation.
> >>
> >>
> >> On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 11:16 AM, José Rodolfo Freitas
> >> <joserodolfo.freitas at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> Hi john, aslak provided us an extension to integrate arquillian with
> jacoco.
> >>>
> >>> https://github.com/arquillian/arquillian-extension-jacoco
> >>>
> >>> we´ve been testing it and it´s working well.
> >>>
> >>> Emma uses offline bytecode instrumentation, and this could be a really
> >>> hellish to analyzes coverage data over the container.
> >>>
> >>> I believe that the best approach in our case (using arquillian) would
> be
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 9:19 AM, John D. Ament <john.d.ament at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>>> I just noticed this morning that emma reports very low code coverage
> on my
> >>>> code.  However, when I switch the injection points from say "SomeBean"
> to
> >>>> "SomeBeanImpl" then my code coverage sudden jumps up.  I expect it to
> be
> >>>> higher.  It seems like Emma has some issues dealing with CDI proxies,
> or
> >>>> possibly arquillian.  Has anyone else noticed this?
> >>>>
> >>>> John
> >>>>
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> seam-dev mailing list
> >>>> seam-dev at lists.jboss.org
> >>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> seam-dev mailing list
> >> seam-dev at lists.jboss.org
> >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
> >
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/seam-dev/attachments/20110704/6a437b83/attachment.html