[seam-dev] 3 weeks until Seam 3.1 Beta1

[George Gastaldi]

Shane,

I remember also in some discussion ago the creation of Seam Transactions
module, which means the decoupling of Seam Persistence.

How´s the status on that ? Is it scheduled for this version also ?

Regards,

George

2011/7/25 Shane Bryzak <sbryzak at redhat.com>

> **
> No problem Pete, leave it with me and I'll see what we can do.
>
> Shane
>
>
> On 25/07/11 18:02, Peter Royle wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>  I haven't had any time for Cron for quite a few weeks now and have no
> idea when I'll next be able to contribute to it. It's currently stable
> except for one bug which is fixed in git, but it lacks anything but the most
> basic of features. Eg there's no storing schedules in the database etc. Also
> there's a pull request from Dave Oxley which I haven't had time to properly
> go through. I think that one can possibly be prioritised lower as it adds a
> fairly advanced concept which changes the SPI a little bit, but on the other
> hand all of Dave's future contributions will likely depend on that so I'm
> probably causing quite a bottleneck there. Everything else is in JIRA.
>
>  It might be necessary for another volunteer, or perhaps someone from
> JBoss to step in and pick up the slack in order to have something worthwhile
> to release in 3 week's time. Sorry.
>
>  Cheers,
>
>  Pete.
>
>
>  On 25/07/2011, at 3:53 AM, George Gastaldi wrote:
>
>  Seam reports is alpha1 but quite stable to be a beta
>
> Em 24/07/2011, às 21:42, Shane Bryzak <sbryzak at redhat.com> escreveu:
>
>   A minimum of a beta level release is the target, if you're at CR already
> for Seam JMS then that's even better.
>
> On 25/07/11 10:27, John D. Ament wrote:
>
> Shane
>
> What versions are you expecting for everyone?  Seam JMS is at CR and JCR is
> about to go beta.
>
> John
> On Jul 24, 2011 7:33 PM, "Shane Bryzak" <sbryzak at redhat.com> wrote:
> > Just a heads up to everyone that we only have 3 weeks remaining until
> > the beta 1 release for Seam 3.1. It would be appreciated if all module
> > leads could reply to this with a status update for your module, and
> > whether you foresee any issues with delivering a beta for your module
> > within this timeframe.
> >
> > I'd also like to remind everyone that we are getting rid of the shaded
> > (combined) jars, so if you need assistance in doing this for your module
> > please let me know and I can help out.
> >
> > Shane
> > _______________________________________________
> > seam-dev mailing list
> > seam-dev at lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
>
>
>   _______________________________________________
> seam-dev mailing list
> seam-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
>
>  _______________________________________________
> seam-dev mailing list
> seam-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> seam-dev mailing list
> seam-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/seam-dev/attachments/20110725/0f38ecf2/attachment.html