[seam-dev] Seam JMS and AS7

[Jason Greene]

./standalone.sh -server-config standalone-preview.xml

Sent from my iPad

On Jul 18, 2011, at 4:42 AM, Pete Muir <pmuir at redhat.com> wrote:

> 
> On 18 Jul 2011, at 10:35, John D. Ament wrote:
> 
>> Well, if you're looking for specific problems I am seeing,
> 
> Well, as always the only problems that can be fixed are those that are know ;-)
> 
>> the big show stopper I have is HORNETQ-741 & AS7-1271, where object messages are violating classloaders.
> 
> Jason/Clerbert, can we make sure this issue is fixed for 7.0.1?
> 
>> I created the HORNETQ one after speaking to stuart a little about it and noted that there was some type of API to be used to fix it.  I haven't verified it yet, but I believe the maven plugin for jboss:hard-deploy will place files in the wrong location.
> 
> The jboss-maven-plugin hasn't been updated for JBoss AS 7, you should use org.jboss.as.plugins:jboss-as-maven-plugin instead :-) This is covered in the JBoss AS docs.
> 
> Sande, you might want to know this for your migration guide :-)
> 
>> I haven't created an issue for it yet, but since datasources and JMS queues are place in to profileName.xml you can no longer deploy these artifacts with your application, which is a huge paradigm shift (JBoss would now be the only full app server to not allow this); all deployment instructions now have to be rewritten.
> 
> Un-managed datasources can be deployed using the @Datasource annotation from Java EE 6 as well.
> 
>> 
>> I also seem to be getting told by a lot of people that I just need to switch to the "everything" release to enable JMS.  This is not the case.  JMS by default is disabled in the "everything" download.  Requires some manual changes to standalone.xml to turn it on.  I'm not sure about others, but shouldn't JMS (and other base services) be on by default in the full EE container.  Granted, it's not certified (and seeing my first note it seems like it can't be) but in preparation for being certified, do a little prep work...
> 
> Jason?