[seam-dev] Don't we need a Seam - Spring module ?

[Antoine Sabot-Durand]

What about discussing this point with CDIDource ? Their code could be a good
base. I asked Rick if I could use it and he seemed to be very open on the
subject... I could do it, except I need time to work on... a given JSR in
which I'm supposed to be involved ;-).

Antoine

2011/6/29 Pete Muir <pmuir at redhat.com>

> It has been discussed multiple times, but it was never delivered on. I set
> it as a requirement for Seam 3.1 when I handed over to Shane, but not sure
> what has happened since.
>
> On 29 Jun 2011, at 15:18, Antoine Sabot-Durand wrote:
>
> > Your smiley suggest that this has been already discussed / decided. I
> missed those discussion apparently. Sorry...
> >
> > Antoine
> >
> > 2011/6/29 Pete Muir <pmuir at redhat.com>
> > Yes, we should do this :-)
> >
> > Marius is the owner.
> >
> > On 29 Jun 2011, at 14:28, Antoine Sabot-Durand wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Team,
> > >
> > > 3 weeks ago I started a consulting mission in a big Insurance company
> that is Redhat / JBoss customer. They use most of Java EE 5 implementation
> provided by JBoss 5 EAP except for EJB 3. No EJB because it's also a Spring
> Shop. One of my missions is to help them to build their next official stack
> based on JBoss EAP 6 (which should be out in January). So I try to promote
> full Java EE 6 stack (with CDI and EJB 3.1) and put Spring aside as an
> alternative/Legacy framework. But it won't work if they don't have a
> supported solution to use their old Spring components / Knowledge in this
> new stack.
> > > More globally one big objection I encounter very often with the
> adoption of CDI (at least in France)  is investment done in Spring. So if we
> want to facilitate the adoption we have to provide a Bridge with Spring to
> allow devs to integrate the "de facto standard" in the "official standard".
> > > I know that Rick Hightower and CDISource Team wrote a nice extension on
> the subject (https://github.com/CDISource/cdisource) but I think such a
> module should be endorsed by a company that'll provide support on it like
> RH.
> > > Seam 2 provided this Bridge so it seems normal to provide it as well in
> Seam 3.
> > > What is your opinion ?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > --
> > > Antoine Sabot-Durand
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > seam-dev mailing list
> > > seam-dev at lists.jboss.org
> > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Antoine Sabot-Durand
> > Manager technique
> > -------------------------------
> > Ippon Technologies
> > 3, rue Bellanger
> > 92300 Levallois Perret
> > t.  01.46.12.48.48
> > f.  01.46.12.48.49
> > p. 06.08.55.34.26
> > e. asd at ippon.fr
> >  www.ippon.fr
>
>


-- 
Antoine Sabot-Durand
Manager technique
-------------------------------
Ippon Technologies
3, rue Bellanger
92300 Levallois Perret
t.  01.46.12.48.48
f.  01.46.12.48.49
p. 06.08.55.34.26
e. asd at ippon.fr
 www.ippon.fr
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/seam-dev/attachments/20110629/bca27d91/attachment-0001.html