[seam-dev] Seam 3.1 CR1 this week

[Nicklas Karlsson]

Like I commented in the JIRA, I think I also had this issue and Stuart
recommended this simple rollback filter which I currently use and appear to
have solved the issue.

On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 11:03 PM, Shane Bryzak <sbryzak at redhat.com> wrote:

> So it looks like the filter idea is what Jason and Lincoln have come up
> with also.  Jason, how long would this take to implement?
>
> On 29/11/11 07:02, Stuart Douglas wrote:
> > This looks like a transaction leak, not sure where from.
> >
> > EE app servers are supposed to have a mechanism in place to detect and
> rollback leaking transactions from a web request. AS 7.0 was missing this,
> however I added it for the 7.1 Beta release.
> >
> > For 7.0 I think the only real solution is to either figure out where the
> TX leak is coming from, or write a filter that detects transaction leaks
> and rolls back.
> >
> > Stuart
> >
> >
> > On 29/11/2011, at 7:54 AM, Shane Bryzak wrote:
> >
> >> Has someone consulted Stuart about this issue?
> >>
> >> On 29/11/11 03:29, Jason Porter wrote:
> >>> That may work. If the steps are relatively small to recreate it.
> >>>
> >>> Sent from my iPhone
> >>>
> >>> On Nov 28, 2011, at 10:16, Cody Lerum<cody.lerum at gmail.com>   wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> I don't have a test for it, and I don't think I will have the time to
> >>>> learn how to repo it in arq anytime soon. I can branch my seam-crm
> >>>> project to create an easy repo if someone can craft a test based on
> >>>> that.
> >>>>
> >>>> -C
> >>>>
> >>>> On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 10:12 AM, Jason Porter<
> lightguard.jp at gmail.com>   wrote:
> >>>>> Cody, do you have an arquillian test that reproduces this? This is a
> pretty big one and I don't want to say this is fixed without a test
> demonstrating this is fixed.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Sent from my iPhone
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Nov 28, 2011, at 9:24, Cody Lerum<cody.lerum at gmail.com>   wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> FWIW I think we should hold off on a CR1 release until
> >>>>>> https://issues.jboss.org/browse/SEAM-99 can be resolved.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> -C
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 7:26 PM, Shane Bryzak<sbryzak at redhat.com>
>   wrote:
> >>>>>>> Hi everyone,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> We are gearing up release Seam 3.1.0.CR1 in a couple of days.
>  Currently we
> >>>>>>> have 56 open issues [1], I'll probably be bumping many of these
> but if you
> >>>>>>> are able to help out by fixing one or two of these then it would
> be much
> >>>>>>> appreciated.  I'll probably start the release on Wednesday evening
> my time
> >>>>>>> (+10GMT), so we'll need to have a code freeze by then.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>>> Shane
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> [1]
> >>>>>>>
> https://issues.jboss.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?mode=hide&requestId=12314291
> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>>>> seam-dev mailing list
> >>>>>>> seam-dev at lists.jboss.org
> >>>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>>> seam-dev mailing list
> >>>>>> seam-dev at lists.jboss.org
> >>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> seam-dev mailing list
> >> seam-dev at lists.jboss.org
> >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> seam-dev mailing list
> seam-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
>



-- 
---
Nik
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/seam-dev/attachments/20111128/7bbf5b85/attachment.html