[seam-dev] Testsuite discussion notes

[John D. Ament]

Good.  I'm scratching my head about some of my pull requests.  JMS is a bit
overly complicated.

On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 6:24 PM, Jason Porter <lightguard.jp at gmail.com>wrote:

> No, we didn't assign it to anyone.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Sep 19, 2011, at 16:19, Shane Bryzak <sbryzak at redhat.com> wrote:
>
> > Was it decided who would take care of the testsuite restructure?  I must
> > admit I wasn't paying much attention during this discussion ;)
> >
> > On 19/09/11 23:39, Jozef Hartinger wrote:
> >> INTEGRATION TESTS
> >>
> >> Structure:
> >>
> >> - api
> >> - impl
> >> - testsuite / src / test / java
> >>
> >> Container-specific issues
> >> - there will be a BaseDeploymentFactory that creates base deployment
> >> based on a system property (arquillian container name)
> >> - there will be no common package scheme for now
> >>
> >> Default profile
> >> - weld embedded
> >> - skipped tests if weld embedded does not make sense in the context of
> >> the module
> >>
> >>
> >> FUNCTIONAL TESTS
> >> - m4 will be used to generate pom files from our templates (stored in
> >> Seam QA github)
> >>
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > seam-dev mailing list
> > seam-dev at lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
> _______________________________________________
> seam-dev mailing list
> seam-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/seam-dev/attachments/20110919/5f77c985/attachment.html