[seam-dev] SAF (aka Entity Framework) idea in Seam 3

[José Rodolfo Freitas]

Yeah, I agree that being declarative is the ideal.
let's say no to inheritance with generics! hehehe.

On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 4:41 PM, Dan Allen <dan.j.allen at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 15:36, José Rodolfo Freitas <
> joserodolfo.freitas at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> What I like most in CDI and Seam3 is that it's very easy to keep things
>> simple and that's something I strongly advocate.
>
>
> +1
>
>
>> Of course there're still boilerplate code, but I think it's minimal
>> (compared to the JEE generations before), and that's something forge can
>> create without the need to satisfy a "framework". Yes, I admitedly am afraid
>> of that word.
>>
>
> That's fine, it doesn't have to be a framework. I do think there is room
> for having some common scaffolding, though. If we can do that by extending
> the programming model (annotations, generic beans or interfaces) so that
> it's declarative, that's probably ideal.
>
> I suggest that we brainstorm proposals using gists (http://gist.github.com).
> That will get the ball rolling. We can start with the idea Jason posted, or
> feel free to take a different approach.
>
> -Dan
>
> --
> Dan Allen
> Principal Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action
> Registered Linux User #231597
>
> http://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen#about
> http://mojavelinux.com
> http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/seam-dev/attachments/20110920/93da7e50/attachment.html