[jbossseam-issues] [JBoss JIRA] Commented: (JBSEAM-1363) ManagedPersistenceContext.getEntityManager() should not throw NamingException
Gavin King (JIRA)
jira-events at lists.jboss.org
Tue May 29 17:47:08 EDT 2007
[ http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBSEAM-1363?page=comments#action_12363462 ]
Gavin King commented on JBSEAM-1363:
------------------------------------
Yes, I understand that, and I am +1 on making the Transactions class a Seam component.
> ManagedPersistenceContext.getEntityManager() should not throw NamingException
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JBSEAM-1363
> URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBSEAM-1363
> Project: JBoss Seam
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 1.2.1.GA
> Reporter: Michael Youngstrom
> Fix For: 1.3.0.ALPHA
>
>
> ManagedPersistenceContext.getEntityManager() has the potential to throw a NamingException because of a call to Transactions.isTransactionActive(). I believe ManagedPersistenceContext.getEntityManager() should assume that a NamingException thrown from Transactions.isTransactionActive() equates to "false".
> My guess is the "throws NamingException" might be a relic of obtaining an EntityMangager from an EMF obtained through JNDI. However, that has moved to initEntityManager() that handles the error of obtaining an EMF on it's own. So, I think getEntityManager should log a NamingException thrown from Transactions.isTransactionActive() and move on as if no transaction is active.
> Mike
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
More information about the seam-issues
mailing list