[jbossseam-issues] [JBoss JIRA] Commented: (JBSEAM-3655) Caching in ServerConversationContext
Nicolas Feybesse (JIRA)
jira-events at lists.jboss.org
Wed Dec 3 08:07:36 EST 2008
[ https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBSEAM-3655?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12440879#action_12440879 ]
Nicolas Feybesse commented on JBSEAM-3655:
------------------------------------------
Michaƫl,
I think you are right : there was a bug in Seam already. (I remember some problems I encountered with initializeTemporaryConversation())
I think there are two needs with Manager.instance().initializeTemporaryConversation() :
1) When we really want a new virgin conversation : the maps need to be cleaned and the cache too (for example : we don't want to keep the EntityManager)
2) When we want a new conversation, but we want to keep objects that are alraedy added.
Personally, I need the two behaviors.
I propose :
public initializeTemporaryConversation(boolean keepContent){ ... }
What about Manager.instance().leaveConversation() ?
NF
> Caching in ServerConversationContext
> -------------------------------------
>
> Key: JBSEAM-3655
> URL: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBSEAM-3655
> Project: Seam
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Core
> Reporter: Michael Youngstrom
> Assignee: Michael Youngstrom
> Fix For: 2.1.1.CR1, 2.1.1.CR2
>
>
> In my application profiling the SeamELResolver is an extremely hot spot. ServerConversationContext was the hottest. I think it would be safe to create a request scoped cache on ServerCovnersationContext. I believe nobody can really be add or removing values from the conversation without going through the ServerConversationContext. In my tests caching resolution of conversation values greatly improved EL performance.
> Index: src/main/org/jboss/seam/contexts/ServerConversationContext.java
> ===================================================================
> --- src/main/org/jboss/seam/contexts/ServerConversationContext.java (revision 9465)
> +++ src/main/org/jboss/seam/contexts/ServerConversationContext.java (working copy)
> @@ -36,6 +36,7 @@
> private final Set<String> removals = new HashSet<String>();
> private final String id;
> private final List<String> idStack;
> + private final Map<String, Object> cache = new HashMap<String, Object>();
>
> private List<String> getIdStack()
> {
> @@ -81,8 +82,15 @@
> this.idStack = new LinkedList<String>();
> idStack.add(id);
> }
> +
> + public Object get(String name) {
> + if (!cache.containsKey(name)) {
> + cache.put(name, resolveValue(name));
> + }
> + return cache.get(name);
> + }
>
> - public Object get(String name)
> + protected Object resolveValue(String name)
> {
> Object result = additions.get(name);
> if (result!=null)
> @@ -148,6 +156,7 @@
> public void set(String name, Object value)
> {
> if ( Events.exists() ) Events.instance().raiseEvent("org.jboss.seam.preSetVariable." + name);
> + cache.remove(name);
> if (value==null)
> {
> //yes, we need this
> @@ -185,6 +194,7 @@
> public void remove(String name)
> {
> if ( Events.exists() ) Events.instance().raiseEvent("org.jboss.seam.preRemoveVariable." + name);
> + cache.remove(name);
> additions.remove(name);
> removals.add(name);
> if ( Events.exists() ) Events.instance().raiseEvent("org.jboss.seam.postRemoveVariable." + name);
> @@ -245,6 +255,7 @@
>
> public void clear()
> {
> + cache.clear();
> additions.clear();
> removals.addAll( getNamesFromSession() );
> }
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
More information about the seam-issues
mailing list