[jbossseam-issues] [JBoss JIRA] Commented: (JBSEAM-975) constraint by inclusion on remote calls object fields

Christian Bauer (JIRA) jira-events at lists.jboss.org
Thu Jan 24 09:46:24 EST 2008

    [ http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBSEAM-975?page=comments#action_12396580 ] 
Christian Bauer commented on JBSEAM-975:

Attach your patch.

> constraint by inclusion on remote calls object fields
> -----------------------------------------------------
>                 Key: JBSEAM-975
>                 URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBSEAM-975
>             Project: JBoss Seam
>          Issue Type: Feature Request
>          Components: Remoting
>            Reporter: Zalder R
>         Assigned To: Shane Bryzak
>            Priority: Optional
> I think it could be nice to define the fields of the objects returned in a "WebRemote call" with an "include" parameter (instead of the current exclude parameter).
> For instance : 
> now you have : 
> @WebRemote(exclude = {"secret"})
> it would be nice to be able to define :
> @WebRemote(include = {"fieldIreallyNeed1", "fieldIreallyNeed2"})
> The reasons for this are many :
> - security : if the object structure varies over time, you would not want the new fields to be available on the client side by default
> - in some cases it's a lot more lightweight (both in the code and in the volume of data sent) to define a minimum set of fields you want instead of the fields you don't want

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira


More information about the seam-issues mailing list