[jbossseam-issues] [JBoss JIRA] Commented: (JBSEAM-2635) Support for OC4J - 10.1.3

Tue Jun 17 02:54:33 EDT 2008

    [ http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBSEAM-2635?page=comments#action_12417499 ] 

Juan Luis Serradilla Amarilla commented on JBSEAM-2635:
-------------------------------------------------------

We have developed a SEAM 2.0 prototype under OC4 10g (10.1.3.3), using RichFaces and Hibernate, The prototype includes access to database with master-detail, pagination and column sorter, e-mail generation, pdf generation and upload file.

Why RichFaces and not IceFaces? Because there's a problem with the IceFaces pdf generator component, and it's very important for us.

The hard work has been for my colegue Juan Miguel, our JSF developer. Really it has been very very hard (two moths), because as you know the documentation about the SEAM2.0-OC4J10g integration was null. Then, thank you very much to Juan Miguel, for his good work.

This work is part of the evaluation of SEAM 2.0, as our possible j2ee framework.

We have to continue our testing work with SEAM2.0 and OC4J, because we've deployed only a prototype, and we've to do more tests with it.

Juan Luis Serradilla
University of Murcia - http://www.um.es
ATICA - http://www.um.es/atica
MNCS - http://www.um.es/atica/mncs
Spain

> Support for OC4J - 10.1.3
> -------------------------
>
>                 Key: JBSEAM-2635
>                 URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBSEAM-2635
>             Project: Seam
>          Issue Type: Task
>          Components: Platform interoperability
>         Environment: Solaris, Linux, Windows
>            Reporter: Chris Simons
>
> To gauge interest in Seam support, whether it be detailed documentation or actual changes to baseline, within the Oracle Container For Java (OC4J) 10.1.3.  
> 10.1.3 is also known as Oracle Application Server 10g Release 3.
> Our personal example...
> After receiving the go-ahead to use the JBoss AS on our application development contract to a U.S. military organization we were disappointed to find that ongoing software standardization efforts, of which were not communicated to contractors, are starting to take affect.  Our client is currently running a distributed Oracle AS 10g Release 2 infrastructure but we're hoping we can convince them to move to Release 3 in the near future.  Therefore, 10.1.3 support for Seam, seeing as we have invested at least a few months into the development cycle, might prove to be critical.
> Please vote for this issue if you are interested in supporting this feature request.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira