[seam-issues] [JBoss JIRA] Moved: (SEAMREMOTING-16) constraint by inclusion on remote calls object fields

Shane Bryzak (JIRA) jira-events at lists.jboss.org
Tue Oct 26 19:10:54 EDT 2010


     [ https://jira.jboss.org/browse/SEAMREMOTING-16?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Shane Bryzak moved JBSEAM-975 to SEAMREMOTING-16:
-------------------------------------------------

        Project: Seam Remoting  (was: Seam)
            Key: SEAMREMOTING-16  (was: JBSEAM-975)
    Component/s:     (was: Remoting)


> constraint by inclusion on remote calls object fields
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SEAMREMOTING-16
>                 URL: https://jira.jboss.org/browse/SEAMREMOTING-16
>             Project: Seam Remoting
>          Issue Type: Feature Request
>            Reporter: Zalder R
>            Assignee: Shane Bryzak
>            Priority: Optional
>
> I think it could be nice to define the fields of the objects returned in a "WebRemote call" with an "include" parameter (instead of the current exclude parameter).
> For instance : 
> now you have : 
> @WebRemote(exclude = {"secret"})
> it would be nice to be able to define :
> @WebRemote(include = {"fieldIreallyNeed1", "fieldIreallyNeed2"})
> The reasons for this are many :
> - security : if the object structure varies over time, you would not want the new fields to be available on the client side by default
> - in some cases it's a lot more lightweight (both in the code and in the volume of data sent) to define a minimum set of fields you want instead of the fields you don't want

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://jira.jboss.org/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        


More information about the seam-issues mailing list