[seam-issues] [JBoss JIRA] Commented: (SEAMREMOTING-16) constraint by inclusion on remote calls object fields
Shane Bryzak (JIRA)
jira-events at lists.jboss.org
Tue Oct 26 19:10:55 EDT 2010
[ https://jira.jboss.org/browse/SEAMREMOTING-16?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12559530#action_12559530 ]
Shane Bryzak commented on SEAMREMOTING-16:
------------------------------------------
Still a valid issue for Seam 3
> constraint by inclusion on remote calls object fields
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SEAMREMOTING-16
> URL: https://jira.jboss.org/browse/SEAMREMOTING-16
> Project: Seam Remoting
> Issue Type: Feature Request
> Reporter: Zalder R
> Assignee: Shane Bryzak
> Priority: Optional
>
> I think it could be nice to define the fields of the objects returned in a "WebRemote call" with an "include" parameter (instead of the current exclude parameter).
> For instance :
> now you have :
> @WebRemote(exclude = {"secret"})
> it would be nice to be able to define :
> @WebRemote(include = {"fieldIreallyNeed1", "fieldIreallyNeed2"})
> The reasons for this are many :
> - security : if the object structure varies over time, you would not want the new fields to be available on the client side by default
> - in some cases it's a lot more lightweight (both in the code and in the volume of data sent) to define a minimum set of fields you want instead of the fields you don't want
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://jira.jboss.org/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
More information about the seam-issues
mailing list