[seam-issues] [JBoss JIRA] Commented: (SEAMFACES-208) Support for resolving no argument methods in an EL value expression

Dan Allen (JIRA) jira-events at lists.jboss.org
Wed Sep 21 19:42:26 EDT 2011


    [ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/SEAMFACES-208?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12629752#comment-12629752 ] 

Dan Allen commented on SEAMFACES-208:
-------------------------------------

Spec reference, section 1.6: http://download.oracle.com/otndocs/jcp/expression_language-2.2-mrel-eval-oth-JSpec/

> Support for resolving no argument methods in an EL value expression
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SEAMFACES-208
>                 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/SEAMFACES-208
>             Project: Seam Faces
>          Issue Type: Feature Request
>          Components: CDI Integration
>    Affects Versions: 3.1.0.Beta2
>            Reporter: Dan Allen
>             Fix For: 3.1.0.Final
>
>
> The EL specification added support for resolving parameterized methods in value and method expressions, with one exception. It does not support resolving methods with 0 parameters. The reason is that an () used at the end of a property is not acknowledged. As a result, the resolver attempts to resolve the method name as a bean property.
> For example, assume we have the method:
> {code}
> public Integer count() {
>     return 1;
> }
> {code}
> If we attempt to resolve this in a value expression using:
> {code}
> #{bean.count()}
> {code}
> We can an error message "count property not found on bean"
> It works as expected if the method has at least one parameter:
> {code}
> public Integer count(Integer i) {
>     return i;
> }
> {code}
> The following expression will resolve to a value of 1.
> {code}
> #{bean.count(1)}
> {code}
> This also breaks resolving the size of a collection:
> {code}
> #{employees.size()}
> {code}
> In this case, the error is a bit strange because it tries to parse size as an index.
> The root cause of all this is that the spec does not properly honor 0 parameters as a valid number of parameters for a parameterized methods. Instead, it ignores the () and treats the expression as a property.
> Method expressions does not have this limitation since both .action and .action() are equivalent expressions.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        


More information about the seam-issues mailing list