[security-dev] [PicketLink] - Module Organization
David M. Lloyd
david.lloyd at redhat.com
Wed Apr 3 12:56:44 EDT 2013
Always, always, always have one module per JAR. If this doesn't make
sense for a project (e.g. split package problems) then this indicates
that the project's JAR boundaries were not properly considered.
On 04/03/2013 11:17 AM, Pedro Igor Silva wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I was thinking about the best way to organize the PicketLink libraries with the AS module structure.
>
> Now that PicketLink have some sub-projects, I was wondering if we should have a single module for all libraries (core, idm, federation, oauth, etc):
>
> org/picketlink/main
> - core.jar
> - idm.jar
> - federation.jar
> - etc.
>
> Or if is better to have different modules for each project:
>
> org/picketlink/core/main
> - core.jar
>
> org/picketlink/idm/main
> - idm.jar
>
> org/picketlink/federation/main
> - federation.jar
>
> Any thoughts ?
>
> Regards.
> Pedro Igor
> _______________________________________________
> security-dev mailing list
> security-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/security-dev
>
--
- DML
More information about the security-dev
mailing list