[security-dev] REST API for user provisioning

[Anil Saldhana]

It is just a prototype with all the hooks that need to be tied together. 
But the basic framework
is in place for Pull Requests to be sent.

On 04/18/2013 02:01 AM, Bolesław Dawidowicz wrote:
> Thanks Anil!
>
> I hope by Monday call we'll be able to discuss how to drive it further.
>
> On 04/17/2013 07:48 PM, Anil Saldhana wrote:
>> Bolek/Stian,
>>      I just put together some preliminary SCIM codebase under the
>> picketlink/scim module.  Take a look.  It is very early that does
>> create/get  users and groups.
>>
>> I am hoping Marko can help out filling the gaps a bit.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Anil
>>
>> On 03/11/2013 08:00 AM, Pedro Igor Silva wrote:
>>> Maybe we can review the Attribute API and have something like that:
>>>
>>> User user = // create user
>>>
>>> user.setAttribute(Attribute.create("profileUrl", "http://company/users/profile?id=121")); // the same as new Attribute("",""), just a helper method
>>>
>>> Attribute addresses = Attribute
>>>
>>>        .create("addresses") // parent, no value defined
>>>
>>>            .add("address1") // child of "addresses" and also a parent
>>>                .add("postalCode", "123")
>>>                .add("streetAddress", "123")
>>>                .add("multivalued", "1","2") // multi-valued attribute for "address1"
>>>
>>>            .add("address2")
>>>                .add("postalCode", "456")
>>>                .add("streetAddress", "456")
>>>
>>> user.setAttribute(addresses);
>>>
>>> Another thing we can review is the getEmail method on the User interface. Maybe we should support a String array to allow 1+ emails for users.
>>>
>>> Regards.
>>> Pedro Igor
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "Shane Bryzak" <sbryzak at redhat.com>
>>> To: security-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> Sent: Friday, March 8, 2013 7:58:31 PM
>>> Subject: Re: [security-dev] REST API for user provisioning
>>>
>>> Would we be targeting SCIM 1.1 or 2.0? Also, it looks like we can
>>> already support most of this already with our identity model, although
>>> for complex types it might be a little bit of a challenge.  I guess one
>>> possibility though is to just make the Attribute value an array of
>>> Attributes itself.
>>>
>>> On 09/03/13 06:53, Anil Saldhana wrote:
>>>> Hi All,
>>>>        now that we have an excellent IDM subsystem as part of PicketLink3,
>>>> we need to next look at incorporating SCIM
>>>> (http://www.simplecloud.info/), a set of standards surrounding REST API
>>>> for Cloud Provisioning. SCIM is part of the IETF.
>>>>
>>>> Probably in the PicketLink 3.1+ timeframe.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Anil
>>>>
>>>>