[security-dev] [PicketLink IDM] - Timed Release 3.0.0-2013Feb08

[Bruno Oliveira]

Nope, the demo made use of PicketLink extensions in the past. Now the purpose is to use PicketLink only, digging into the sources, I can't see any good reasons to use PicketLink extensions.


-- 
"The measure of a man is what he does with power" - Plato
-
@abstractj
-
Volenti Nihil Difficile



On Saturday, February 9, 2013 at 5:58 PM, Pedro Igor Silva wrote:

> Nice. Your aerogear-security module is a good way to abstract implementations/security providers. The demo is using picketlink-extensions impl, right (aerogear-security-picketbox) ?
> 
> Regards.
> Pedro Igor
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Bruno Oliveira" <bruno at abstractj.org (mailto:bruno at abstractj.org)>
> To: "Pedro Igor Silva" <psilva at redhat.com (mailto:psilva at redhat.com)>
> Cc: security-dev at lists.jboss.org (mailto:security-dev at lists.jboss.org)
> Sent: Friday, February 8, 2013 8:41:58 PM
> Subject: Re: [security-dev] [PicketLink IDM] - Timed Release 3.0.0-2013Feb08
> 
> 
> Hi Pedro, 
> 
> 
> Shane helped me this week to get our demo working, if you want to take a sneak peak http://controller-abstractj.rhcloud.com/aerogear-controller-demo/ 
> 
> 
> Sources at: https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-controller-demo and switched to the latest timed releases. 
> 
> 
> I'll work on the next week testing HTTP digest/LDAP authentication. 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> "The measure of a man is what he does with power" - Plato 
> - 
> @abstractj 
> - 
> Volenti Nihil Difficile 
> 
> On Friday, February 8, 2013 at 4:05 PM, Pedro Igor Silva wrote: 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Hi, 
> 
> 
> Today, we released a new timed version for the PicketLink IDM project. The documentation and quickstarts are being elaborated, but you can always check the test cases for a lot of usage examples. 
> 
> 
> <dependency> 
> <groupId>org.picketlink</groupId> 
> <artifactId>picketlink-idm-impl</artifactId> 
> <version>3.0.0-2013Feb08</version> 
> </dependency> 
> 
> 
> This version contains the changes required to support the last discussion regarding groups with the same name and group's path. 
> 
> 
> https://issues.jboss.org/browse/PLINK-89 
> 
> 
> Regards. 
> Pedro Igor 
> _______________________________________________ 
> security-dev mailing list 
> security-dev at lists.jboss.org (mailto:security-dev at lists.jboss.org) 
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/security-dev 
> 
> 


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/security-dev/attachments/20130211/dc47af05/attachment.html