[teiid-dev] [teiid-designer-dev] Materialized Views

[John Doyle]

----- "Barry Lafond" <blafond at redhat.com> wrote: 
> 
> All, 
> 
...... 
> That all said, would it be wrong to NOT treat these Materialization Physical models as dependencies? Users would be totally responsible for including them in a VDB containing the original virtual models? 
> 
> Comments, ideas? 

While it certainly would be best to add them automatically like we do for other models, would it be possibly to flag a missing Materialization Physical model as a validation error on a VDB without changing the metamodel? Would that be good enough? 

> 
> Barry 
> 
> _______________________________________________ teiid-designer-dev mailing list teiid-designer-dev at lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/teiid-designer-dev 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/teiid-dev/attachments/20100713/7d078080/attachment.html