[teiid-dev] UDF Related Changes in 7.0 Teiid

[John Verhaeg]

On Mar 10, 2010, at 12:57 PM, Ramesh Reddy wrote:

> The "path" will *not* be required. 
> 
> If we make this required, then we need to push this on all the models
> including the dynamic vdb models that have have no path for their
> models. Also, there is support of UDF in the Dynamic VDBs. 


Sorry, I was forgetting that you can now have models that have no corresponding artifact within the VDB.  So, what I'm really getting at is we shouldn't  have any default behavior that assumes an XMI extension on a file when a path is specified; we'll always provide the extension.

Thanks,

JPAV