[teiid-issues] [JBoss JIRA] (TEIID-4560) Documentation issues with TEIID-3669

[Steven Hawkins (JIRA)]

    [ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/TEIID-4560?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13362041#comment-13362041 ] 

Steven Hawkins commented on TEIID-4560:
---------------------------------------

[~rareddy] can you review https://github.com/teiid/teiid-documents/commit/a200abb8b6c8e2a74dc7835963cf07ced86835d9 to make sure we are on the same page about getting the security docs in line with having not having a security domain per transport and lessening the use of the passthrough login module?

> Documentation issues with TEIID-3669
> ------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: TEIID-4560
>                 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/TEIID-4560
>             Project: Teiid
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Documentation
>            Reporter: Steven Hawkins
>            Assignee: Steven Hawkins
>             Fix For: 9.2
>
>
> With the consolidation of the session service, we don't have a security-domain per transport.  Rather there is a default, which can also be set on a per-vdb basis.  The rationale is that establishing a role mapping needs to be consistent about where the enterprise role names are coming from.
> The documentation of using other security mechanisms from the web tier needs to be reconciled with this as it currently still documents changing the security domain at a transport level.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.2.3#72005)