[teiid-issues] [JBoss JIRA] (TEIID-4700) Google translator inconsistent behavior for DELETE and SELECT for null values

[Lucie Fabrikova (JIRA)]

     [ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/TEIID-4700?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Lucie Fabrikova updated TEIID-4700:
-----------------------------------
    Description: 
In teiid  I observed following inconsistent behavior:
Q1: select intnum,  intkey from smalla where intnum > -10 AND intnum < 20 
Q2: delete from smalla where intnum > -10 AND intnum < 20 

Q1 returns rows without null values for intnum, but Q2 deletes also rows with null values for intnum.

I observed that if I remove the lower boundary (ie. Q3: select intnum,  intkey from smalla where intnum < 20 and similarly for delete), both selected and deleted rows contain null values, so the result is consistent.

The server.log is empty, so I didn't attach it...



  was:
In teiid  I observed following inconsistent behavior:
Q1: select intnum,  intkey from smalla where intnum > -10 AND intnum < 20 
Q2: delete from smalla where intnum > -10 AND intnum < 20 

Q1 returns rows without null values for intnum, but Q2 deletes also rows with null values for intnum.

I observed that if I remove the lower boundary (ie. Q3: select intnum,  intkey from smalla where intnum < 20 and similarly for delete), both returned and deleted rows contain null values, so the result is consistent.

The server.log is empty, so I didn't attach it...





> Google translator inconsistent behavior for DELETE and SELECT for null values
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: TEIID-4700
>                 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/TEIID-4700
>             Project: Teiid
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 9.2
>         Environment: 9.2.0.Alpha2
>            Reporter: Lucie Fabrikova
>            Assignee: Steven Hawkins
>
> In teiid  I observed following inconsistent behavior:
> Q1: select intnum,  intkey from smalla where intnum > -10 AND intnum < 20 
> Q2: delete from smalla where intnum > -10 AND intnum < 20 
> Q1 returns rows without null values for intnum, but Q2 deletes also rows with null values for intnum.
> I observed that if I remove the lower boundary (ie. Q3: select intnum,  intkey from smalla where intnum < 20 and similarly for delete), both selected and deleted rows contain null values, so the result is consistent.
> The server.log is empty, so I didn't attach it...



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.2.3#72005)