[teiid-issues] [JBoss JIRA] (TEIIDSB-170) Automate materialization to JDG
Ramesh Reddy (Jira)
issues at jboss.org
Tue Apr 21 20:38:43 EDT 2020
[ https://issues.redhat.com/browse/TEIIDSB-170?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14049962#comment-14049962 ]
Ramesh Reddy commented on TEIIDSB-170:
--------------------------------------
The approach I will be taking is using a shared Infinispan cluster, where user is responsible for creating the cluster and providing the connection details in the form of a `Datasource` properties in the YAML file.
The DataSource name MUST be named `CacheStore`, when Operator runs it will find this Datastore and generate and run the S2I build, in the maven build then uses `vdb-codegen-plugin` a generate a new VDB, where all the Views with `materialized = true` flag without an external materialization target set are picked and copied/cloned into a separate schema called `materialized` with their fully qualified name. The status table also gets created in the same schema. A VDB with the name `materialized.ddl` gets generated and put on the classpath.
Then Operator in the next step will adjust the `application.properties` to point to the new `materialized.ddl` VDB and loads the VDB.
> Automate materialization to JDG
> -------------------------------
>
> Key: TEIIDSB-170
> URL: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/TEIIDSB-170
> Project: Teiid Spring Boot
> Issue Type: Enhancement
> Components: OpenShift
> Reporter: Steven Hawkins
> Assignee: Ramesh Reddy
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 1.5.0
>
> Original Estimate: 1 week
> Time Spent: 1 day, 3 hours
> Remaining Estimate: 3 days, 5 hours
>
> Create an internal materialization replacement needs that is turnkey materialization to JDG (little to no user setup required)
> - the operator may create the infinispan cluster if needed
> - the status table and internal representation of the materialization target would be setup automatically
> For the user this would be as simple marking a view as materialized and then it would be populated in jdg upon deployment. They would not have any concerns with cache naming, status tables, etc.
> For simplicity the initial version would make a similar assumption to the current internal logic - it is for only a specific vdb. If the vdb cr is modified, then it's expected that the cache would be recreated.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v7.13.8#713008)
More information about the teiid-issues
mailing list