[undertow-dev] ResourceHandler give 0 byte Content-Length for HEAD
Bernd Eckenfels
ecki at zusammenkunft.net
Fri Mar 13 16:20:38 EDT 2015
Hello Jason,
yes you could send a wrong value and it would be
better to not answer one than a wrong one, but even better woild it
be to follow the RFC recommendation, that states that the headers of a
HEAD should be identical to those of a GET. In fact the content-length
is one of the most interesting informations one would want to query
with a HEAD request.
Gruss
Bernd
Am Fri, 13 Mar 2015 14:55:39 -0500
schrieb Jason Greene <jason.greene at redhat.com>:
>
> > On Mar 13, 2015, at 2:47 PM, Bernd Eckenfels
> > <ecki at zusammenkunft.net> wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > with all versions I tried (including 1.2.0.Beta9) undertow-core will
> > return content-length: 0 if a HEAD request is made.
> >
>
> -snip-
>
> > < HTTP/1.1 200 OK
> > < Connection: keep-alive
> > < Last-Modified: Fri, 13 Mar 2015 19:24:58 GMT
> > < Content-Length: 0
> > < Content-Type: text/xml
> > < Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2015 19:40:51 GMT
> > <
> > * Connection #0 to host localhost left intact
> >
> > According to RFC2616 sc 14.13 this needs to be non-null.
> >
>
> It’s wasting bandwidth, so we should probably not send it. However,
> its a legal value:
>
> 14.13 says "Any Content-Length greater than or equal to zero is a
> valid value."
>
> --
> Jason T. Greene
> WildFly Lead / JBoss EAP Platform Architect
> JBoss, a division of Red Hat
>
More information about the undertow-dev
mailing list