[undertow-dev] WebSocket sending back pressure

peter royal peter.royal at pobox.com
Thu Jul 7 08:08:32 EDT 2016


I looked some more and cancellation would be a huge change - I'm going
to see how far I can get by using the existing callback for flow
control.

-pete

-- 
(peter.royal|osi)@pobox.com - http://fotap.org/~osi

On Wed, Jul 6, 2016, at 09:43 PM, Stuart Douglas wrote:
> Some of the methods take a WebSocketCallback that will notify you on
> completion or error, however at the moment there is no way to cancel a
> message.
> 
> Stuart
> 
> On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 6:56 AM, peter royal <peter.royal at pobox.com>
> wrote:
> > I am finding that sometimes I have WebSocket connections that are unable
> > to flush messages out the socket at the rate I am generating messages.
> >
> > I'm using the core.WebSockets class to send messages. Is it possible to
> > achieve this with what exists currently? My initial guess is no..
> > conceptually it would be nice for core.WebSockets to return a
> > CompletableFuture-style object that would let me get a callback when the
> > message is sent, or have the ability to cancel it if it is still sitting
> > in the send queue.
> >
> > I'm happy to help build something into Undertow if it is a welcome
> > addition.
> >
> > -pete
> >
> > --
> > (peter.royal|osi)@pobox.com - http://fotap.org/~osi
> > _______________________________________________
> > undertow-dev mailing list
> > undertow-dev at lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/undertow-dev


More information about the undertow-dev mailing list