[webbeans-dev] BeanImpl/BeanModel/AnnotatedItem split
Pete Muir
pmuir at redhat.com
Thu Nov 13 05:12:12 EST 2008
I've now done the second phase of this.
Pretty much everything is now done through the Annotated* which is a
wrapper around Java Reflections which adds:
* Annotation support for elements of classes
List<AnnotatedConstructor> constructorsAnnotatedWithInitializer =
clazz.getAnnotatedConstructors(Initializer.class);
* Meta annotation support for elements of classes
List<AnnotatedField> fieldsWithBindingTypesOnThem =
clazz.getMetaAnnotatedFields(BindingType.class);
* injection aware invocations
AnnotatedClass<Foo> = new AnnotatedClassImpl(Foo.class);
Foo instance =
clazz
.getAnnotatedConstructors
(Initializer.class).iterator().next().newInstance(manager);
would create a new instance of the first constructor annotated
@Initializer, injecting all parameters
Alternatively, you could do:
field.inject(manager); to inject a field
* Make Parameter a first class construct
e.g.
paramter.getAnnotations();
parameter.getValue(manager);
parameter.getType()
parameter.isStatic();
* Even out the Modifiers into javabean methods
clazz.isStatic();
clazz.isFinal();
I've been building this as we go along, so the layer is not complete.
It can be added to as needed...
On 9 Nov 2008, at 18:01, Pete Muir wrote:
> Ok, I just committed the first round of this:
>
> * Merge *Model into *Bean, all init* and check* methods should be
> put there
> * I created an EventBean from EventModel, but I don't quite
> understand the architecture of the Event stuff so, David, I may have
> broken stuff here
> * I removed all the *Constructor stuff
> * I removed the xmlAnnotatedItem stuff, and put in an example of how
> we could do this with XmlSimpleBean, and adding the common logic
> higher up the class hierarchy, for example
>
> protected void initType() {
> if (isDefinedInXml()) {
> // Do XML init from parsed XML data structure
> } else {
> // Do init from reflection
> }
> }
>
> I would like someone to review this architecture (Gavin ;-)...
>
> * Gavin, I tried not to clobber your commits around lifecycle
> callbacks and EJB lookup when merging this in. The tests do pass, so
> if they covered all cases, then it should be good :-)
>
> Next, I plan to merge the behaviour of fields (inject value from
> manager), parameters (inject from manager) and methods (invoke,
> injecting parameters from manager) into the reflection layer. I'll
> also tidy up usage of this layer across the whole codebase, and add
> some javadoc. I'll try to commit this on Thursday.
>
> Pete
>
> On 6 Nov 2008, at 18:43, Pete Muir wrote:
>
>> Continuing with my monologue, once we merge the model into
>> BeanImpl, I also want to review the Injectable stuff, I don't think
>> that is quite right, it should probably merged into the the
>> annotated* stuff or merged into BeanImpl.
>>
>> I want to do producer methods first, then consider this, as at that
>> point I will have a much clearer picture of what is sensible (that
>> was the "motivation" for this - I didn't know where I was going
>> well enough back in June).
>>
>> WDYT?
>>
>> On 6 Nov 2008, at 10:53, Pete Muir wrote:
>>
>>> But I still think the abstraction over reflection is useful
>>> (annotated*) not least because it encapsulates all the logic re.
>>> meta-annotations and fixes the class hierarchy.
>>>
>>> On 6 Nov 2008, at 10:41, Pete Muir wrote:
>>>
>>>> I agree, it's on my todo list (to merge model and BeanImpl) to one.
>>>>
>>>> On 6 Nov 2008, at 06:33, Gavin King wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Pete,
>>>>>
>>>>> would you be able to explain what is motivating the use of a
>>>>> "3-layered" approach to the Bean implementations?
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm finding the resulting parallel class hierarchies really
>>>>> difficult
>>>>> to work with. In particular, I got totally stuck on the
>>>>> implementation
>>>>> of MethodConstructor.invoke() for producer methods.
>>>>>
>>>>> I really think the code would end up a lot more elegant if we
>>>>> flattened stuff out into the Bean subclasses...
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Gavin King
>>>>> gavin.king at gmail.com
>>>>> http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Gavin
>>>>> http://hibernate.org
>>>>> http://seamframework.org
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> webbeans-dev mailing list
>>>>> webbeans-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/webbeans-dev
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> webbeans-dev mailing list
>>>> webbeans-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/webbeans-dev
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> webbeans-dev mailing list
>>> webbeans-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/webbeans-dev
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> webbeans-dev mailing list
>> webbeans-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/webbeans-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> webbeans-dev mailing list
> webbeans-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/webbeans-dev
More information about the weld-dev
mailing list