[webbeans-dev] Re: @Supports

[Scott Ferguson]

On Nov 23, 2008, at 10:56 AM, Gavin King wrote:

>
>> Why does QueueEndpoint implement any interfaces?  That looks like an
>> implementation detail that doesn't need to be exposed to the users.
>
> In this case it probably doesn't make sense, since we don't inject
> QueueEndpoint directly. However in other cases it would be useful.

Do you have an example in mind?  I don't understand what use case is  
motivating the auto-proxy generation feature.

> Notice that I said "let you", not "require you to".

Sure, but the feature still needs to make sense.  I like the JMS  
generalization, but don't see what the proxy capability adds to the  
spec.  Or if that auto-proxy generation is useful in itself, shouldn't  
it be decoupled from the @Produces concept?

-- Scott

>
>
> -- 
> Gavin King
> gavin.king at gmail.com
> http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Gavin
> http://hibernate.org
> http://seamframework.org
>
>