[webbeans-dev] Generic classes as bean types allowed?

[Mark Struberg]

Dan,

txs for the WBRI-311 tip. In fact I'm currently running the TCK for our Apache OpenWebBeans implementation and we have the same issue. But I actually hit this problem a lot earlier.

For your second comment: I'm not a WebBeans RI user but work on the Apache implementation, so I hope this very list is still correct.


LieGrue,
strub

--- On Tue, 8/4/09, Dan Allen <dan.j.allen at gmail.com> wrote:

> From: Dan Allen <dan.j.allen at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [webbeans-dev] Generic classes as bean types allowed?
> To: "Mark Struberg" <struberg at yahoo.de>
> Cc: webbeans-dev at lists.jboss.org
> Date: Tuesday, August 4, 2009, 12:06 AM
> Yes, except it is currently broken
> according to this issue report: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/WBRI-311
> 
> If you want to see examples, check out the test cases in
> the TCK.
> 
> 
> And, as a parting point, this post should likely have been
> here: http://seamframework.org/Community/WebBeansUsersForum
> 
> -Dan
> 
> 
> On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 3:31 PM, Mark Struberg <struberg at yahoo.de>
> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> Hi!
> 
> 
> 
> I have the following situation:
> 
> 
> 
> public class MyClass<T> {
> 
> ...
> 
> }
> 
> 
> 
> and like to inject a specialised instance of this class:
> 
> 
> 
> public class MyOtherBean {
> 
>   private MyClass<Integer> myIntCls;
> 
> }
> 
> 
> 
> >From reading the spec (2.2.1), I was not sure if this
> is allowed. It would make sense, since we can nail down the
> exact implementation at the injection point. Otoh the
> classpath scanning part will get trickier.
> 
> 
> 
> LieGrue,
> 
> strub
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> 
> webbeans-dev mailing list
> 
> webbeans-dev at lists.jboss.org
> 
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/webbeans-dev
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Dan Allen
> Senior Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in
> Action
> Registered Linux User #231597
> 
> http://mojavelinux.com
> 
> http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction
> http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Dan
> 
>