[webbeans-dev] Spec draft with 330 annotations
Gavin King
gavin.king at gmail.com
Mon Aug 17 20:49:47 EDT 2009
Yes, that's right, and thanks for spotting that error! I will fix it
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 17, 2009, at 7:43 PM, Peter Royle
<howardmoon at screamingcoder.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Just for clarity, is the @Inject annotation mandatory now, even if
> you have a qualifying type. Eg, if you had:
>
> @Inject @Casual Greeting hi;
>
> Would this be equivalent:
>
> @Casual Greeting hi;
>
> In section 3.7.1 it says: "An injected field may be declared by
> annotating the field with any qualifier type.", but I couldn't find
> any examples that didn't use @Inject.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Pete.
>
>
>
> On 18/08/2009, at 7:19 AM, Gavin King wrote:
>
>> Changes in this draft:
>>
>> * use of JSR-330 annotations
>> * Policy -> Alternative
>> * @Observes(notify=...) -> @Observes(receives=....)
>>
>> There are a couple of other minor clarifications requested by the RI
>> team, but these are the main changes.
>>
>> We still need to resolve this issue of static injection....
>>
>> --
>> Gavin King
>> gavin.king at gmail.com
>> http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Gavin
>> http://hibernate.org
>> http://seamframework.org
>> <JSR-299-20090817.pdf>_______________________________________________
>> webbeans-dev mailing list
>> webbeans-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/webbeans-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/weld-dev/attachments/20090817/986f394b/attachment.html
More information about the weld-dev
mailing list